Home page Products Analysis of child support guidelines The COSTshares model Links to off-site resources About Guideline Economics

 



CS Guidelines Primer
How to Fight My Case
Cost Shares
Analysis by GuidelineE.
Analysis by Others
By State:
      Calculators
      Laws
      Analysis
      Citizens’ Groups
Consulting Services
Links
Citizens’ Groups

Formulas By State
Site Map

E-mail Us
Guideline Software
Rogers Economics

 Help Us Stay Current
Please email us news on your state’s new legislation, reform efforts, and four-year reviews.

Get Adobe Reader
Free MSWord Viewer
Free MSExcel Viewer
Free MS PowerPoint Viewer

Child Support
Economics, Theory, and Practice

Guideline Economics offers an alternative to the Income Shares and Percentage of Obliger Income methods of calculating child support that are commonly used in U.S. states and many countries. Our method is based on the actual costs of children and sound economics.
     The principles of are also used to vary a presumptive award in individual cases.
     This site provides a wide array of information and research on the many methods of calculating child support. Some are fair and reasonable, many are not. You decide how child support should be calculated.

CLE Seminars on GA Child Support Deviations

Georgia lawyers: 5 regular CLE hours. (Public welcome.)
   Can you develop and argue convincing numbers for Schedule E? Can you rebut someone else’s?
  Tuesday, February 19, 2008, State Bar Building, Atlanta.
Brochure (full details and registration form)
Sample Segment
Sample: Warnings about the Worksheets

News

Georgia Changes from Percentage of Obligor to Income Shares
Georgia takes a small step forward January 1, 2007 when it replaces its child support guidelines based on percentage of obligor's income (which fails to take into account the custodial parent's income), with an Income Shares model. Many child support amounts will change. For FAQs on the new law, click here.

North Dakota Considers Joint Legal/Physical Custody [PDF]
North Dakota is considering a presumption of joint legal and physical custody. (14-09-06.7) This is a summary of the provisions with an analysis of its implications to child support. Further analysis of the child support implications is in PDF or MSWord.

Tennessee Dumps Obligor Only Guidelines for Income Shares
On November 5, 2004, the Tennessee Department of Human Services announced a change in its child support guidelines. Effective January 18, 2005, Tennessee will begin using Income Shares child support guidelines, developed by Policy Studies, Inc., with some state-specific changes developed by the Tennessee Department of Human Services. More information can be found at the Tennessee site, which includes tutorials on how to use the new guidelines. For a PDF of the new guidelines click here.

Virginia Backs Off on Child Support Increases
The 2003 Virginia state Senate Bill 1312 would have increased child support throughout the state. It was quietly tabled at the end of the year (will not be submitted for debate) after detailed testimony by R. Mark Rogers at a special hearing before the Joint Legislative Ad Hoc Committee on Child Support on November 19, 2003. In collaboration, constitutional law consultant John Remington Graham submitted a legal critique in January 2004. Both suggested the bill contained numerous flaws that would make it difficult to uphold. See Mr. Roger’s testimony and Mr. Graham’s critique, both in PDF
Features

A primer for child support guidelines

Prepared independently for Montana’s child support review panel. For more details and comments by R. Mark Rogers go to Montana.
The Economics of Child Support Determination
These presentation slides in PDF show the factors that need to go into child support guidelines and awards. Given by R. Mark Rogers to the Fathers and Families Conference in Detroit, June, 2005.
Reservists
Many reservists have a sudden loss in income and need to modify child support obligations or face heavy arrearage.  For details go to News & Information and select “Reservists.”
Law Professor Admits No Economic Basis for Child Support (PDF)
University of Texas law professor Jack Sampson, coauthor of The Sampson & Tindall Family Code Book, admitted to the July 12, 2006 hearing of the Texas House Juvenile Justice Committee that the state’s child support guidelines are totally arbitrary. No economic data was used to set the guidelines. He was forced to admit this after listening to this testimony.
Child Support Schedule and Parenting: Time Adjustment Issues (PDF)
Though a submission to the Georgia Child Support Commission, this paper's examination of allowances in child support awards for the division of parenting time is relevant and useful to any jurisdictions.
New Hampshire Commission Describes High Cost of Excessive Child Support Awards (PDF)
The New Hampshire Child Support Review Commission’s 2004 report. A state legislative committee describes the high public cost of excessive child support awards.
Why Would a Custodial Parent Hire a Child Costs Expert?
A PDF document.

High Income Families
Those who earn more than $60,000 a year, or where both parents' combined income is over $100,000, are at greatest risk for excessive child support awards.

Critique of PSI's Income Shares (PDF)
This thorough critique of Policy Studies Inc.’s Income Shares model for child support was presented on March 31, 2006 by R. Mark Rogers to the Alabama Administrative Office of the Courts and the Alabama Guideline Review Panel. Also available as a PDF of the PowerPoint presentation.
The Law And Economics Of Child Support Payments
This recent book is a collection of papers by R. M. Rogers, Sanford Braver, and others and provides important citation material. They find that child support guidelines currently in use in the U.S. typically generate awards three to four times what they would be if based on economically sound cost tables and a true equal duty of support for both parents. See the full description [MSWord.] Available at the publisher's web site and (least costly) Barnes and Noble.